The Wilson Beacon

Sexism present in science products

Back to Article
Back to Article

Sexism present in science products

Shirah Lister

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






The Science Techno Barbie comes with a spinning closet rack, a rotating shoe rack, and a washing machine. The gendered appliances reinforce sexist stereotypes instead of breaking down a barrier. While it is good to see Barbie use engineering to solve issues, this proves the idea that science must be dumbed down for girls to be able to enjoy it.

Many science kits that are ‘for girls’ just seem to be the pink version of a product that has already been created. Do all science kits for girls need to be smothered in beauty rituals? Do manufacturers believe that girls can’t handle creating a volcano? Do they think girls can’t enjoy learning about car engines? It’s time science kits learned to embrace girls without limiting the science they teach them.

Manufacturers need to start building and marketing science kits to both boys and girls in the same way. This doesn’t mean we need to scrap all the manicure kits, but instead of slapping a bright sign that says ‘for girls’, we can allow all genders to enjoy the wonders of nail polish. This also means that these mega science kits should become more accessible to females as well. We shouldn’t shelter young girls from the horrors of crystal growing, but instead open up the door of possibilities and allow kids to choose what they find most appealing.

We can’t say that we want more females in science and engineering while encouraging them to create perfumes instead of rockets. There is a girl out there that might cure cancer, or find a way for humans to live on Mars, but if we stifle her scientific energy, she can never go to her full potential. Currently, only 29 percent of the science and engineering workforce is female. And that is with all the fashion inspired engineering, so are these girly kits really doing us any favors?

Although these ‘for girls’ science kits limit kids from the amount of science they use, it is still exposing them to a small amount of science and chemistry, which is something to acknowledge. Barbie might not be a rocket, but it’s a step up from where we were 20 years ago.

 

PHOTO COURTESY OF CREATIVE COMMONS

About the Writer
Shirah Lister, Junior Editor

Shirah is a sophomore and junior editor who has been writing for the Beacon for a year (since the beginning of her frosh year). Shirah enjoys listening...

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Beto O’Rourke: We’re all in this together

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    DCPS should drop Sodexo, a private prison contractor

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Objectifying lists in bathrooms reflect failure to protect women

  • Sexism present in science products

    Features

    Editors-in-Chief bid farewell

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Too many classes, too little education

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    The outdoor gap endangers our planet

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Betsy DeVos deserves an F in education policy

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    College and the military shouldn’t be the only options after high school

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Adult women fail to uplift young women

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Every month should be women’s history month

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    New AP fees threaten early college level exposure

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Abundance of APs normalizes student stress

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    It’s time to civilize the abortion debate

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Streaming services limit artists’ profits

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Green New Deal isn’t radical – it’s necessary

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Mansplaining in math discourages female students

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Controversial white artists deserve the same scrutiny as YNW Melly

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Staff editorial: College process is a meritocracy with no merit

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    DC’s liberal atmosphere fuels political ignorance

  • Sexism present in science products

    Opinions

    Empower students, not staff, to address bullying

Navigate Right
The Student News Site of Woodrow Wilson Senior High School
Sexism present in science products