The Wilson Beacon

Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

Photo+courtesy+of+Max+Pixel
Photo courtesy of Max Pixel

Photo courtesy of Max Pixel

Photo courtesy of Max Pixel


Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






DCPS needs to make up its mind. After hastily reinforcing its attendance policy in the middle of last year, DCPS has done a complete 180, reverting to an overly lax attendance policy which takes away almost all emphasis on students going to school. The new policy allows students to be absent for 30 days in a class—nearly one-third of an entire course at Wilson—without any direct impact on the student’s transcript.

The Beacon was openly critical of last year’s sudden emphasis on attendance, and more so the consequences given to students for rules they didn’t know they had already broken. Both in policy and implementation, DCPS failed its students. So we were very happy to see it go, and we were relieved that a new policy was announced over the summer. However, the new policy is not close to the solution DCPS needed to compensate for its previous blunders.

Wilson and DCPS worked very hard last year to stress the importance of attendance. While their efforts were executed poorly, they came from a good place. Students *should* be in school, and asking kids not to miss exorbitant amounts of class per advisory or to show up on time to most classes most of the time is completely reasonable—which is why this extreme policy change is unsettling.

We commend DCPS for fielding student/parent concerns and attempting to please them through instituting a new attendance policy at a more convenient time. Although it was timely, the new policy disregards the struggles that the DCPS community underwent trying to adjust to such a drastic change last year. Many students’ lives were sent off-track because of an attendance policy that DCPS now admits was just not that important.

Although the previous policy produced an overwhelming amount of negative consequences, it did one thing well: it made clear that DCPS cares about attendance. But now, we aren’t so sure.

DCPS needs to send a clear message about its rules and priorities. If school starts at 8:55, why are there no penalties for students coming in at 9:00? If being on time to class matters, why are there no penalties for excessive tardiness? If showing up consistently matters, why are there no penalties for missing too many classes in an advisory? Do you have to be in class to learn, or do you have to mostly be in class to learn?

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Criminalizing abortion would endanger unprepared teenagers

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Disneyfication of movies reduces artistic quality

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    The case for communism

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Climate change: America is denying disaster

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    New theatre director represents step towards inclusivity

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Trump’s right to choose?

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Stop enabling abusive men

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Recent events in Israel leave Tigers on both sides of the debate

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Trump clearly misunderstands DACA

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Staff editorial: Year in Review: Wilson Community exhausted by DCPS’ game of broken telephone

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Don’t let 16-year-olds vote

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Brandy Melville amplifies unrealistic body standards

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Let 16-year-olds vote

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Conservative response to youth activism shows why we need it

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    The Democrats’ path forward

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Staff editorial: Toxic drug culture demands student action

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Student Government Association lacks real Authority

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Don’t be complicit with Kanye

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    We can’t tell Kanye nothing

  • Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform

    Opinions

    Focus on gun control leaves Dreamers in the dark

The Student News Site of Woodrow Wilson Senior High School
Staff Editorial: DCPS takes misguided approach to attendance reform